![]() One of the original developers of Ingres returned to Berkeley in 1985 (after founding a company that commercialized Ingres) to develop a successor to Ingres that he named Postgres. The story of Ingres and all the databases that grew out of it is fascinating, but mostly because it lent (part of) its name to another open source database. It was released under a Berkeley Source Distribution (BSD) license, which made it open source software, and it became the base for many commercial database products. Ingres was one of the first relational database management systems, starting out as a project at UC Berkeley in 1973. In the beginning was the word, and the word was Ingres. But for all they have in common, PostgreSQL and MySQL have a number of characteristics that set them apart from each other, as we’ll see in a moment. They’re both secure RDBMSes with support for clustering and network fault tolerance. Postgres (as it’s often known) and MySQL have both been around for a long time. That’s not surprising - they’re also the top two open source relational databases, serving as the back ends of countless commercial, open source, and in-house applications. I prefer Postgres, though I haven't had a chance to use it, as most of the time I'm not choosing the platform.MySQL and PostgreSQL are the top two database sources that Fivetran replicates to data warehouses for data analytics. partitioning, replication, covering indexes, in-memory operation are all really useful for high-volume. I believe you'll find some features of MySQL/Maria scaled with the use by high volume sites like news aggregators Slashdot, & Digg. MySQL/Maria supports running on systems with fewer resources (it's generally smaller), more/better/additional partitioning/sharding methods, more replication strategies (partially thanks to the for-profit wing of MySQL, covering indexes on InnoDB, in-memory operation. I'm not an expert in the area, but I am a bit interested in what sort of errors you experienced trying to use MariaDB.Īs far as feature comparisons, I found a few sources. MariaDB is the literal, not just spiritual, successor to MySQL. These features give you performance, functionality, or development advantages, but further tie your software to the chosen platform.Īfter Oracle bought MySQL, people were understandably nervous about the future of the project. And with long-running projects, you start identifying and consuming the unique features of the tools you are using. Simple and fast and "helpful" is a really compelling argument, and part of why it underscores a lot of long-running projects. ![]() Adherents of strict type checking or people charged with running down data inconsistencies will strongly disagree that this is a "feature" at all, though. Automatically correcting common or simple errors was super convenient for small developers in the late 1990s, early 2000s. It also was more permissive about incorrect types and automatic type conversions (still is, I believe). MySQL was missing a lot of functionality, like transactions, but was really simple and blazing fast. Twenty years ago, Postgres was powerful but comparatively heavy. Maybe one day pgsql will be a silver bullet for all projects, but for now I don't think so. In other project with simpler queries we choose mysql because maintenance stops will kill our SEO. In our actual project we need to stop psql once per month to exec full vacuum (autovacum can't run because we have a lot of writes and wraparound problem is a real problem for us), but mysql can't run our complex queries without die.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |